Skip to content

Conversation

@vegard
Copy link
Contributor

@vegard vegard commented Oct 20, 2014

The XML file is more verbose than it needs to be. YAML looks neater to me.

'make check' passes.

This is the script I used to generate optable.yml: https://gist.github.com/vegard/7474502

Consider this a proposal/request for comments, this is an old branch I had lying about, there could be issues I haven't run into yet.

The XML file is more verbose than it needs to be. YAML looks neater
to me.

'make check' passes.

This is the script I used to generate optable.yml:
https://gist.github.com/vegard/7474502
@vmt
Copy link
Owner

vmt commented Dec 25, 2014

@vegard, I am no fan of xml either, and yaml does look better. The only reason I am reluctant to use yaml is because it creates a dependency on the python yaml module which is not available by default on a typical system (I think).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants