-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
chore: move releases.json to new format #140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
obrusvit
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we can merge it as it but two points to discuss:
- the only field missing is
"translations". Maybe we can add it later. - the names of the binaries in
trezor/datafollow slightly different naming convention by dropping the first 8 chars of the commit hash. Should we follow the established naming convention (without the commit has part) also in the new repository?
1847c3f to
74db1e3
Compare
Sure, I updated it to contain the "translations" as we agreed. Regarding the naming convention for the binaries I do noth have strong opinions, here I am just following the same we have right now. I also updated the script to check the new format for releases JSON. |
obrusvit
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one thing at this point:
translationsfield is not necessary fort1b1(legacy) as Model One doesn't support translations. We should either remove it or keep the field empty object.
Sure that makes a lot of sense, thanks for catching it. I added fixup commit changing |
a60e080 to
f931bcd
Compare
f931bcd to
739bdbe
Compare
Updating releases JSONs for all the FWs in legacy
releases.jsonfor all the models.Also updating the scripts so they check the revisions in the old files as well as in the new ones.
Related trezor/trezor-suite#19763