Skip to content

Conversation

@ANAMASGARD
Copy link

@ANAMASGARD ANAMASGARD commented Jan 21, 2026

Solution

Install the unmodified package (original name) alongside the renamed package, allowing \Sexpr{PKG:::...} calls in Rd files to resolve correctly.

Testing

  • Created minimal test package with \Sexpr{testpkg:::rd_helper()} in Rd file
  • Test confirms bug exists before fix, passes after fix

ScreenShot{Test}

Screenshot From 2026-01-21 16-27-05

Fixes #98

Create minimal package with Rd file containing Sexpr testpkg triple-colon

atime_versions renames package to testpkg.SHA

Rd processing fails with no package called testpkg error

Test expects error confirming bug exists

Fix will install unmodified package first making test pass
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

un-modified package should be installed in atime_versions

1 participant