Skip to content

Conversation

@weiznich
Copy link
Contributor

During a dependency review we noticed that the similar rustls-native-cert includes a development script. This development scripts shouldn't be there as they might, at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the [bans.build.interpreted] option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.

During a dependency review we noticed that the similar rustls-native-cert includes a development script. This development scripts shouldn't be there as they might, at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the `[bans.build.interpreted]` option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.
@weiznich weiznich requested a review from ctz January 5, 2026 09:46
@djc djc enabled auto-merge January 5, 2026 10:12
@djc djc added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 5, 2026
Merged via the queue into rustls:main with commit 7692c5e Jan 5, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants