Added push to remote for PR creator.

[richardgaunt]

Checklist before requesting a review

• This PR does not have an associated ticket
• I have provided information in section about WHY something was done if this was not a normal implementation
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have run new and existing relevant tests locally with my changes, and they passed
• I have provided screenshots, where applicable

Changed

1. Improved the remote check.
2. Added push to remote functionality.

Screenshots

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@richardgaunt has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be0d0ae and f34fbb9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• index.js (2 hunks)

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/push-to-remote

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 8.39%. Comparing base (172e38d) to head (f34fbb9).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
index.js	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main     #16      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   8.52%   8.39%   -0.14%     
========================================
  Files          1       1              
  Lines        129     131       +2     
========================================
  Hits          11      11              
- Misses       118     120       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	8.39% <0.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.