Skip to content

Conversation

@tex3d
Copy link
Contributor

@tex3d tex3d commented Dec 9, 2025

Released shader model was updated recently, along with a change to one of the tests for ExperimentalNop.

However, a test update went against the intent of the test. As this test would require an unusual situation where there are two experimental shader model versions above release supported, and as it tests already-well-tested common opcode version checking infrastructure, it didn't really seem necessary, so I've removed that test.

I also added instructions for the next release shader model change.

@tex3d
Copy link
Contributor Author

tex3d commented Dec 9, 2025

Note, when reviewing the test changes, it might be slightly confusing because the rename matching is (understandably) misfiring. It says:
invalid-experimental-dxil-6-10-op-on-6-9.ll → experimental-op-on-release-sm.ll
and deleted: invalid-experimental-dxil-6-10-op-on-6-8.ll

But it's really:
invalid-experimental-dxil-6-10-op-on-6-8.ll → experimental-op-on-release-sm.ll
and deleted: invalid-experimental-dxil-6-10-op-on-6-9.ll

Because I updated 1.8/6.8 metadata to 1.9/6.9 for the update in latest release version.

@tex3d tex3d changed the title Update ExperimentalNop, tests, add instructions for release shader model update Update ExperimentalNop tests, add instructions for release shader model update Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: New

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants