Skip to content

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Jan 18, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
toml workspace.dependencies patch 0.9.10+spec-1.1.0 -> 0.9.11

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

toml-rs/toml (toml)

v0.9.11

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 18, 2026 03:46
@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team January 18, 2026 03:46
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Jan 18, 2026

PR Summary

Updates dependency lockfile.

  • Bumps toml in Cargo.lock from 0.9.10+spec-1.1.0 to 0.9.11 and updates its checksum

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 478b733. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jan 18, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 18, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Bumps the Rust crate toml from 0.9.10+spec-1.1.0 to 0.9.11 (Renovate dependency update).
Changes: Updates dependency resolution accordingly (lockfile-only change in this diff).

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 18, 2026

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Comparing deps/rs/toml-0.x-lockfile (478b733) with main (75dfdf3)

Summary

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run1

Footnotes

  1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$38.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$21.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-84.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-49.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.77 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.88 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.07 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.16 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.59 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.56 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$73.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$48.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 807 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$86.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$86.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$252 \mathrm{ms} \pm 677 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.466 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$44.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$50.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$63.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.740 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$69.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$47.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$71.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$53.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$60.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.769 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$61.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$535 \mathrm{ms} \pm 844 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants