Skip to content

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Jan 17, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) 4.0.16 -> 4.0.17 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v4.0.17

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 17, 2026 18:13
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Jan 17, 2026

PR Summary

Updates testing tooling to the latest patch.

  • Bumps vitest from 4.0.16 to 4.0.17 in libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/package.json
  • Aligns lockfile to 4.0.17 for vitest and related @vitest/* packages

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6b1c636. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team labels Jan 17, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link

augmentcode bot commented Jan 17, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Vitest test runner dependency for @hashintel/petrinaut from 4.0.16 to 4.0.17 (Renovate-managed bump).

Changes:

  • Bumped vitest version in libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/package.json.
  • Updated yarn.lock to align lockfile resolutions with the new version.

Technical Notes: Vitest 4.0.17 includes various bug fixes and adds experimental OpenTelemetry support; CI/test runs should confirm there are no behavioral regressions.

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link

@augmentcode augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team January 17, 2026 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant