H-5881: Bump transitive Cargo dependencies #8260

TimDiekmann · 2026-01-15T16:40:44Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Update dependencies in Cargo.lock to their latest versions.

🔍 What does this change?

Updates various Rust dependencies to newer versions, including:
- aws-lc-rs from 1.15.2 to 1.15.3
- aws-lc-sys from 0.35.0 to 0.36.0
- aws-sdk-s3 from 1.118.0 to 1.119.0
- aws-smithy-checksums from 0.63.12 to 0.63.13
- aws-smithy-observability from 0.1.5 to 0.2.0
- aws-smithy-runtime from 1.9.6 to 1.9.8
- aws-smithy-runtime-api from 1.9.3 to 1.10.0
- aws-smithy-types from 1.3.5 to 1.3.6
- bon from 3.8.1 to 3.8.2
- bon-macros from 3.8.1 to 3.8.2
- cc from 1.2.50 to 1.2.52
- chrono from 0.4.42 to 0.4.43
- clap from 4.5.53 to 4.5.54
- codspeed from 4.1.0 to 4.2.1
- crc-fast from 1.6.0 to 1.9.0
- darling from 0.21.3 to 0.23.0
- getrandom from 0.2.16 to 0.2.17
- h2 from 0.4.12 to 0.4.13
- indexmap from 2.12.1 to 2.13.0
- libredox from 0.1.11 to 0.1.12
- moka from 0.12.11 to 0.12.12
- portable-atomic from 1.11.1 to 1.13.0
- proc-macro2 from 1.0.104 to 1.0.105
- rustix from 1.1.2 to 1.1.3
- rustls from 0.23.35 to 0.23.36
- socket2 from 0.5.10 to 0.6.1
- syn from 2.0.111 to 2.0.114
- time from 0.3.44 to 0.3.45
- tokio from 1.48.0 to 1.49.0
- tower from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3
- url from 2.5.7 to 2.5.8
- windows-sys from 0.60.2 to 0.61.2
- zmij from 1.0.0 to 1.0.14

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

Existing tests should cover these dependency updates

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch
Run the test suite to ensure all tests pass with the updated dependencies
Verify that the application functions as expected

vercel · 2026-01-15T16:40:50Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
ds-theme	Error		Jan 17, 2026 6:43pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 17, 2026 6:43pm

cursor · 2026-01-15T16:40:51Z

PR Summary

Refreshes the dependency graph by updating many transitive crates via Cargo.lock, with no code changes.

Bumps AWS stack (aws-sdk-s3, aws-smithy-*, aws-lc(-sys)) and storage-related crates
Upgrades networking/runtime stack: tokio 1.49, tower 0.5.3, h2 0.4.13, socket2 0.6.x, reqwest ecosystem deps
Updates TLS/security: rustls 0.23.36, webpki-roots 1.0.5, openssl-probe 0.2.0
Refreshes serde/proc-macro/tooling: syn 2.0.114, proc-macro2 1.0.105, serde_json 1.0.149, indexmap 2.13
Updates WASM toolchain: wasm-bindgen* 0.2.108/0.4.58, web-sys 0.3.85, wasip2 1.0.2
Misc platform and time libs: windows-sys 0.61.2, chrono 0.4.43, time 0.3.45

Scope: lockfile-only dependency updates; no API or application logic changes included.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 49b2d9f. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

TimDiekmann · 2026-01-15T16:41:02Z

H-5881: Bump transitive Cargo dependencies #8260 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

augmentcode · 2026-01-15T16:41:28Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR updates the repository’s Rust dependency lockfile to pick up newer transitive Cargo crate versions.

Changes:

Updates Cargo.lock with newer crate resolutions across the dependency graph.
Bumps multiple AWS-related crates (e.g., aws-sdk-s3, aws-smithy-*, aws-lc-*) to recent patch/minor releases.
Updates widely-used runtime/network crates like tokio, tower, h2, socket2, and rustls.
Refreshes supporting ecosystem crates (e.g., chrono, clap, url, indexmap, syn/proc-macro2).

Technical Notes: No source code changes are included; this is a lockfile-only update intended to keep builds reproducible while incorporating upstream fixes and compatibility updates. Running the existing Rust build/test suite should validate the new resolutions.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-01-15T16:45:03Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.17%. Comparing base (2a2257a) to head (49b2d9f).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8260   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.17%   59.17%           
=======================================
  Files        1208     1208           
  Lines      113805   113805           
  Branches     5029     5029           
=======================================
+ Hits        67340    67341    +1     
+ Misses      45672    45671    -1     
  Partials      793      793

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.88% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.18% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.89% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.47% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`25.61% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`30.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`46.65% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`81.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`68.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.10% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-01-15T16:49:37Z

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing t/h-5881-bump-transitive-cargo-dependencies (49b2d9f) with main (2a2257a)}

Summary

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

graphite-app · 2026-01-17T18:20:12Z

Merge activity

Jan 17, 6:20 PM UTC: This pull request can not be added to the Graphite merge queue. Please try rebasing and resubmitting to merge when ready.
Jan 17, 6:20 PM UTC: Graphite disabled "merge when ready" on this PR due to: a merge conflict with the target branch; resolve the conflict and try again..

graphite-app · 2026-01-17T18:44:11Z

Cargo.lock

+version = "3.3.0"
 source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
-checksum = "5eb8a2a1cd12ab0d987a5d5e825195d372001a4094a0376319d5a0ad71c1ba0d"
+checksum = "9710d3b3739c2e349eb44fe848ad0b7c8cb1e42bd87ee49371df2f7acaf3e675"


The crc package is being downgraded from version 3.4.0 to 3.3.0, which contradicts the PR's stated purpose of updating dependencies to their latest versions. This downgrade could:

Reintroduce bugs that were fixed in 3.4.0

Remove features or improvements from the newer version

Create version conflicts with other dependencies expecting 3.4.0 or newer

- version = "3.4.0" + version = "3.3.0" # Should be >= 3.4.0

This needs to be corrected to ensure crc is at version 3.4.0 or newer.

Suggested change

version = "3.3.0"

source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"

checksum = "5eb8a2a1cd12ab0d987a5d5e825195d372001a4094a0376319d5a0ad71c1ba0d"

checksum = "9710d3b3739c2e349eb44fe848ad0b7c8cb1e42bd87ee49371df2f7acaf3e675"

version = "3.4.0"

source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"

checksum = "9710d3b3739c2e349eb44fe848ad0b7c8cb1e42bd87ee49371df2f7acaf3e675"

Spotted by Graphite Agent

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

github-actions · 2026-01-17T19:51:11Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-45.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-83.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-66.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.936 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$414 \mathrm{ms} \pm 834 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$96.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$261 \mathrm{ms} \pm 771 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.688 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.368 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.675 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$94.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 424 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$54.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$572 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update Cargo.lock to bump dependency versions

acb7265

graphite-app bot assigned TimDiekmann Jan 15, 2026

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jan 15, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Jan 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 15, 2026 16:44 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – ds-theme January 15, 2026 16:44 Failure

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 15, 2026 16:46 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash January 15, 2026 16:53 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested a review from a team January 15, 2026 17:02

indietyp approved these changes Jan 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into t/h-5881-bump-transitive-cargo-dependencies

49b2d9f

TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge January 17, 2026 18:40

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 17, 2026 18:43 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – ds-theme January 17, 2026 18:43 Failure

graphite-app bot reviewed Jan 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 17, 2026 18:45 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash January 17, 2026 18:52 View deployment

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2026

github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 17, 2026

H-5881: Bump transitive Cargo dependencies #8260

Are you sure you want to change the base?

H-5881: Bump transitive Cargo dependencies #8260

Uh oh!

Conversation

TimDiekmann commented Jan 15, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Jan 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Jan 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann commented Jan 15, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 15, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Summary

Footnotes

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot commented Jan 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merge activity

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot Jan 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

vercel bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 15, 2026 •

edited

Loading

graphite-app bot commented Jan 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading