-
|
I have a python library that includes a Python C extension. This C extension is an implementation detail and I'd like the lib users to now have to refer to it explicitly. Given such a setup, say the lib is named Instead of writing But when I then use sphinx with Anyone has any experience with such a setup? Anything I can do on the side of nanobind make it all appear to be in one flat module? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I found that I could use Sphinx's |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I found that I could use Sphinx's
autodoc-process-signatureevent to do a string place on the signature. (With the current caveat that currently Sphinx only emits a match for the first overload.)