-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.7k
Open
Labels
CLIIssues related to the Codex CLIIssues related to the Codex CLIcode-reviewIssues relating to code reviews performed by codexIssues relating to code reviews performed by codexenhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
What feature would you like to see?
The reasoning effort for the /review command was hardcoded to Low in this PR: #3701
From the PR alone, it's not clear why the review mode reasoning effort was set to Low. Proposing to allow a user-configurable reasoning effort, either by:
- Inheriting the current reasoning effort from the thread's
config.modelincodex-rs/core/src/codex.rs - Creating a user preference for review mode reasoning effort in
config.toml - (if it's preferred to not allow configurability): At minimum, consider bumping the reasoning effort to Medium for more dynamic reasoning
From a local POC, it seems like approach 1 works well and creates much more comprehensive reviews than before (gpt-5.1-codex-max, xhigh effort inherited)
I'd be happy to raise a PR for this, seeking alignment first.
Additional information
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
CLIIssues related to the Codex CLIIssues related to the Codex CLIcode-reviewIssues relating to code reviews performed by codexIssues relating to code reviews performed by codexenhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request