@ConfigProperty applicable to a TYPE or a METHOD?

[jeanouii]

The @ConfigProperty has a target like

@Target({METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER, TYPE})

Do we currently support METHOD and TYPE?
Looks like in most cases, it's for fields.

For version, I would only keep FIELD and PARAMETER that we can easily support

Happy to push a PR if we are ok.

[smoyer64]

I would say that CONSTRUCTOR and METHOD are more appropriate than TYPE as those two targets would potentially be used by those in a CDI environment.

[struberg]

Yes, I'm not sure myself why it's TYPE, but TYPE is really cool as it allows us to apply it to interfaces!

In Geronimo-config we used this to implement interface-style config a la Apache DeltaSpike.
See #12

[struberg]

We should probably rename it to something else? @Configured for example?