What aspects of parametric glyphs should go into the ontology?

[jakebeal]

For parametric glyphs to be usable via automation, they likely want to have some of their key attributes / parameters exposed in the ontology. What wants to go there and how do we want to integrate this into the workflow?

[jakebeal]

Two obvious candidates: baseline, bounding box.

[goksel]

@jakebeal Is there any place where we can access information about baseline and bounding box?

[jakebeal]

That's a question for @chofski and @jamesscottbrown , I think. I'm not sure this information is meaningfully accessible yet, which is why I've got it marked as 3.0 for milestone.

[chofski]

This information is to some extent encoded in the current SVGs, but the pSVGs would allow us to have these explicitly defined. In terms of other key attributes these will like be related to "types" of glyph.